New law on parenting

Image: FreeDigitalImages
Image: FreeDigitalImages

After a long wait the new Children’s Act has come to the rescue of many despairing single parents who are blocked from seeing their children by spiteful and obstructive ex-partners.

It’s a common complaint among divorced and unmarried single parents – despite having the law on their side non-custodial parents often end up at the mercy of the custodial parent’s whims because it’s too expensive to take legal action.

This has now changed. Previously they’d have to approach the high court on issues of custody and access to a child. Now they can appeal to an officer of the children’s court at their local magistrate’s court and it won’t cost them a cent.
The new Children’s Act recognises grandparents who feel their rights have been infringed.

The new Children’s Act is enforceable after 13 years of intensive research and consultation. It heralds a new dispensation for children – now their best interests come first, experts say.

The emphasis now falls on children’s right to proper parental care – from both parents and other parental figures such as grandparents.

‘‘The new Act stipulates any parent can be fined or jailed if he/she refuses another parent with parental rights and responsibilities contact with his or her child.’’ And that’s prison time up to a year, Ashley Theron, executive director of Child Welfare South Africa, says in Johannesburg.

‘‘It also recognises the contact rights of grandparents and step-parents who have meaningful relationships with children,’’ he says.

The aim of the Act is to give children a say in decisions that affect their lives, says Hester Bosman-Sadie, behavioural scientist and co-author of A Practical Approach to the Children’s Act.

In custody decisions gender and sexual orientation no longer rule, such as the ‘‘maternal preference rule’’ that saw kids usually placed with their mothers, Bosman-Sadie says.

‘‘The new Act reflects the idea that competent parenting has more to do with personality than gender. More and more fathers are getting to care for their children.’’

More on the new law in the 15 April issue of YOU.



Thank you for sending us your comment.


Terms of use:

YOU editors reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.

All comments received could be used for publication in YOU magazine or any related Media24 brands.

Comments are moderated and published or deleted based on the following criteria:
  • The relevance of the comment to the article
  • Offensive content
  • Suspicious usernames and/or e-mail addresses
  • Duplication of opinion and/or comments
  • Comments on older articles might not be processed
  • YOU encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of users published on YOU are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of YOU.

Comments (69)


  1. jean jacques
    2010/09/04 02:40:29 AM
    My ex took off with our child since december 2008. I received a call three month later from one of her friend in uk that they are now living there with him. The guy was quite chuffed to tell me that my daughter and her mother were staying with him. I am heartbroken. I really don't know what to do. I've tried to apply for visa to go to uk look for them but i've been refused clearence. My daughter means the world to me. How can this new law help see my daughter?
  2. M Naude
    2010/08/30 11:54:01 AM
    Dis tyd dat vaders en oupa en oumas, ook nou regte het waar dit die kinders aangaan,
    jong meisies wil verhoudings aangaan links en regs, dan word raak hulle swanger. en as hulle nou voel hulle wil nie meer aan gaan met die verhouding nie los hulle die kind se pa en hy moet maar net 2 de kom waar dit sy kind aan gaan dan word ook op die pa en sy ouers se gevoelens gespeel met enige ding soos doen wat ek sê of julle sien nie die kind nie, maar wanneer, sy ons nodig het of verlee is oor gunsies dan is ons goed genoeg, ek wat ouma is,is siek en sat daarvan dat my seuns deur hulle X meisies aan die neus gelei word, en dan het ons nog so oneindig baie ook vir hulle gedoen vir die jare wat hulle by ons gebly het,
    ons kleinkinders is baie lief vir my en hulle oupa, en hulle pappas en wil baie graag by die pappas wees, maar die mammas dink hulle het alleen sê in alles, en dat net hulle kan na die kinders omsien, kan hulle nie bietjie aan die kinders ook dink nie en op hou om die arme kinders tegebruik om die pappas tespyte, dis baie lelik, my seuns werk en dra hulle deel by tot die kinders se opvoeding, maar dis net nie goed genoeg nie
    Dis tyd dat die meisies besef hulle kan nie net babas in die wêreld bring en dink die wet is aan hulle kant nie ,
    Dankie dat daar nou meer regte is vir die Papas
  3. velo
    2010/08/18 08:49:30 AM
    it is very funny how women out there get away scot free when they lie when it comes to abuse and molesting the law really have to do something about them and trere lots of fathers is victims to those women and dont have the cuts to speak out and alows this sick women to get away
  4. mother
    2010/07/31 09:09:37 PM
    aptsolutly disgusted with the new law n the court system in general in the uk.does the public realise how parents that are violent and sex offenders still have the right to get contact still have the right to get unsupervised contact if they deemed not a risk to the child dispite their convictions.and still have the right to refuse the parent permission to take the child out of the country for a better new quality of life.when is the courts going to give protection n support to these children do they realise how many children die and get abused every day.because ex violent partners are still allowed rights under the fathers act n childrens act yes even pedophiles with convictions.the law in this country is a sad joke n needs to be changed soon so the right thingsare in place to protect children from ex partners like this.because new laws n the lawsa as they stand are being manipulated by these ex partners to controll n manipulate,and continune to abuse the child and their ex partner.
  5. disgusted
    2010/07/21 07:39:22 PM
    8 months he hasnt seen his child and with permission, now he wants to see my son, by (name), its about time we take the best interest of our children at heart my child hasnt seen his father, doesnt even know who he is, this has got nothing to do with our kids but fathers who come and go as they please or not pitch up too see there children...Wake up, its our kids that ar going to get hurt by neglect from there boys
  6. keep the main thing THE MAIN THING
    2010/07/14 10:57:56 PM
    It is so sad to notice that the majority of people who aired their opinions here, has no clue whatsoever, that maintenance and custody are separate issues and should be dealt with as such. How can we claim to act in the best interest of our children if we continue to measure their best interest in terms of maintenance contributions.
    It is evident from the available correspondence that those who make contributions suffer the same fate if not worse, as those who doesn't contribute...so can we really judge anyone.
    Having watched the mess from the outside for some time and later ending up in it myself, i found one common denominator in our entire problem...PREJUDICE.
    Most people, especially our public servants has a predisposed perception of who the perpetrator is, making it impossible to serve the community or achieve justice. Hence, the lack of serving our children s best interest.
    As long as we tackle this problem with our emotions, we are doomed to condemn generations to come into the same endless/senseless battle that we find ourselves in.
    Do you have to be the only parent in your child's life, to be the best parent you can be?.... Why are you afraid to share this child?
  7. juanita
    2010/07/13 11:39:04 AM
    I need to know if any application has been brought in our High Court regaring a Surrogate agreement after april 2010 which application was made a court order as required from the new childres act? If so, when and where can i find details recarding the court order
  8. Velo
    2010/06/23 02:23:24 PM
    I have been to the childrens court todat which was a waste of time, they still dont have a process in place. Three month passed and the Department of Justice cannot find a working process. Eish.
    Really dont know what to do.
    The new Act stipulates any parent can be fined or jailed if he/she refuses another parent with parental rights and responsibilities contact with his or her child.’’ And that’s prison time up to a year, Ashley Theron, executive director of Child Welfare South Africa, says in Johannesburg. Please someone tell me were about can I find this information in the act.
  9. Lynette
    2010/06/19 10:27:03 AM
    I went to our local magistrates offices to enquire about your article 09 April (New law on parenting - The new Children's Act), the emphasis on grandparents rights regarding contact with their grandchildren; the magistrate said that he had just come back from Pretoria and had not heard of any new Children's Act that you refer to pertaining to grandparents rights.

    Please can you give me the Act No: and any other relevant info pertaining to grandparents & their grandchildren.
  10. ABDUL
    2010/06/15 01:24:36 PM
    THE NEW LAW STILL DOES NOT PROTECT THE FATHER AGAINST THE MOTHER AND HER CORRUPT LAYWER
  11. Elsa Muclkhuyse
    2010/06/04 04:15:29 PM
    The law is all about who can afford what and no amount of legislation is going to be binding to the individual who cannot afford the best counsel. This new act is being abused by the father to my 2 children because, firstly, he is an advocate and well connected and ,secondly because he can afford the best counsel and can draw the matter on for years and, thirdly, he has the resources to manipulate this new piece of legislation to fulfill his own needs. I gave up my career to be the best "mom" I could possibly be but I find myself being questioned by the law and out of pocket.....and our children are hurting the most.
  12. ROSHNI
    2010/06/01 02:12:06 PM
    My brother died on 05/12/2008 and lived with my parents from birth and from the time that he married which was in 03/2004. His first child was born in 04/2005 and was in my mums care from 2m months old as him and his wife were working, the second was born in 10/2008 and was also in my mums care from birth as my brother was critically ill and his wife was taking care of him. After my brothers death my mum was taking care of both the children as my sister in law was working. My brothers wife moved out in 01/2010 and now refuses for both my parents to see their grandchildren. Please can you advise.
  13. CONCERNED MOTHER
    2010/05/21 04:16:25 PM
    @VELO

    THE NEW LAW IS IN AFFECT ALREADY!

    PLEASE PEOPLE I HAVE SPOKEN TO THE FAMILY ADVOCATES AT THE HEAD OFFICE AND THEY SAY PLEASE DO NOT AND I MEAN DO NOT LISTEN TO THIS YOU ARTICLE AS IT IS NOT THE WHOLE TRUTH, THEY CAN NOT LOCK YOU UP FOR NOT LETTING THE OTHER PARENT FROM SEEING THEY CHILD IF THERE IS NO VISITION ORDER IN PLACE, PLEASE CALL THE FAMILY ADVOCATES OFFICE FOR THE REALLY TRUTH ABOUT THE NEW LAWS.
  14. FATHER AND GRANDPARENTS BEING USED
    2010/05/20 12:04:16 PM
    IF PARENTS OF A LITTLE GIRL AGED 10 WAS NOT MARRIED FATHER PAYS MAINTENANCE MONTHLY AT COURT BESIDES MAINTENANCE TAKE HER FOR SHOPPING GRANDPARENTS ALSO TAKES HER FOR SHOPPING FOR HERSELF BUT YET IT ENDS JUST THERE.FATHER NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE HER FOR HALF OF SCHOOL HOLIDAYS OR EVERY 2ND WEEK-END.FATHER WENT WITH SAPS AFTER MOTHER PUSHED HIM AROUND BECAUSE SHE DID NOT WANT THE UPSET DAUGHTER TO GO WITH HER FATHER.HE SHOWED POLICE NEW CHILDENS ACT AND POLICE WAS NOT INTERESTED IN THE NEW LAW. IN THE PRESENCE OF THE CHILDS MOTHER POLICEMAN SAYS IF THIS MOTHER SAYS SHE WILL NOT ALLOW YOU TO SEE THIS CHILD UNTIL SHE IS 18YRS OLD THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO. CHILD IS SCARRED 10 TIMES WORST FOR THOSE WORDS. CHILD IS PUNISHED BECAUSE FATHER GOT MARRIED TO SOMEONE ELSE.CHILD VERY,VERY SATISFIED WITH STEPMOTHER.THEY HAVE A GOOD RELATIONSHIP WHENEVER CHILD SPEAKS TO HER TELEPHONICALLY CHILD ASKS HER PLEASE COME FETCH ME. WHY MUST MOTHER BE SO SELFISH SHE WENT ON WITH HER LIFE.CONSIDER THE CHILDS HAPPINESS TOO.
  15. RAJ
    2010/05/19 07:12:04 PM
    TO VELO
    YOUR ADVISE TO GO TO THE HIGH COURT BY THE FAMILY ADVOCATE IS RUBBISH.THE FAMILY
    ADV WAS SUPPOSED TO BE THE VOICE OF THE MINOR CHILD.THESE PEOPLE WHICH IS SAD
    TO SAY ARE JUST WORKING FOR A SALARY WHO DONT FEEL ARE PAIN AS CONCERNED
    FATHERS.THEY ARE VERY UNEDUCATED ABOUT THE NEW CHILDRENS ACT THAT WAS
    IMPLEMENTED ON THE FIRST OF APRIL 2010.I DONT KNOW WHERE YOU LIVE BUT YOU
    SHOULD HAVE A MAGISTRATE COURT IN YOUR AREA.IN THE MAG.COURT,YOU SHOULD HAVE
    A CHILDRENS COURT IN THERE.YOU SHOULD APPROACH THE CLERK OF THE COURT AND
    REQUEST A FORM 2(BRING MATTER TO CHILDREN'S COURT IN TERMS OF SECTION 53 OF
    THE CHILDREN'S ACT 2005(ACT NO.38 OF 2005).THEY WILL BE FORCED TO PUT YOUR
    CASE ON ROLL.IT IS FREE.THE MAGISTRATES ARE NOW ALSO GIVEN POWERS TO MAKE
    DECISIONS CONCERNING SECTION 21 INSTEAD OF REFERRING THE APPLICATION
    BACK TO THE FAMILY ADV.I AM PRESENTLY IN THAT PROCESS AND I CAN SEE IT IS GOING
    TO WORK FOR ME.WISH YOU ALL THE LUCK.
  16. Advice ito act
    2010/05/19 03:00:01 PM
    Family Law Clinic
    Head Office Somerset West Tel 021 8529628
    Fax 086 537 5579
    E-mail info@familylawclinic.org.za


    Cape Town Tel 021 4619891
    Strand Tel 021 8537994
    Mitchell’s Plain Tel 021 3912176
    George Tel 044 8743603

    Head Office in WC but might open branches elsewhere, possibly one in Gauteng

  17. Velo
    2010/05/19 08:34:26 AM
    Hi, I have had my second meeting(Section 21) at the Family Advocates Office with no joy, the mother of my child the councilor that there is no way that she is going to allow the child to spend time with me, The councilors response was that I need to go high court to have acess to my child.

    What i dont understand is that there is a law passed why doesnt the right people know about it and and why they cant implment the law and process.


    One of the responses from a father( Happy Dad) stated that he had gained his acess rights using the new law.

    Message for happy dad, please can you let me know the secret process you have used.

    Does our law work in certain provices and fall away in others because staff dont know about it or dont know how to apply.
  18. Miss Molly
    2010/05/07 09:53:17 PM
    Re: concerned parent. Legally a parent can not take a child out the country without the consent of the other parent whether they were married previously or not. It does happen though, but you do have legal rights.
  19. RAJ
    2010/05/06 08:40:51 PM
    I HAVE TRIED EVERYTHING EVEN GONE TO COURT BUT TO NO AVAIL . MY EX DOES NOT WANT ME TO SEE MY SON. THE COURT SAY IT IS NOT READY FOR THE NEW ACT CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME I DONT KNOW WHAT TO DO ANYMORE
  20. from hgn
    2010/05/06 03:59:22 PM
    This from a Huisgenoot reader

    Brenda
    2010/04/14 03:40:38 nm
    Goeie nuus! Ek was eers by die Landdroskantore waarna hul my verwys het na die maatskaplike werker. Sy het my verseker dat die nuwe wet wel vanaf 1 April 2010 in werking is. Sy het al die nodige dokumente en die nuwe wetgewing vir my gegee, ons kon dadelik met die nodige stappe begin. Nou kan ons voorentoe beweeg!!!
  21. from the act
    2010/05/06 03:51:50 PM
    Velo, not sure if you read the full article in the printed edition, but it also depends on the particular case, on whether the parent wanting access has always been an involved parent. Have you for example always paid maintenance? That is one aspect of the `responsibilities' referred to. It's a two- way process.

    The full article says whereas Children's Courts previously dealt with children in need of care (i.e. when children in distress had to be removed from homes), the courts can now handle matters where people are unhappy about how much contact they're allowed with their kids.

    See below, from the act, that became enforceable in its entirety on 1 April (contact is the new term for access):

    Matters Children’s Court may adjudicate
    45. (1) Subject to section 1(4), a children’s court may adjudicate any matter,
    involving—
    (a) the protection and well-being of a child;
    (b) the care of, or contact with, a child;
    (c) paternity of a child;
    (d) support of a child;
    (e) the provision of—
    (i) early childhood development services; or
    (ii) prevention or early intervention services;
    (f) maltreatment, abuse, neglect, degradation or exploitation of a child, except
    criminal prosecutions in this regard;
    (g) the temporary safe care of a child;
    (h) alternative care of a child
  22. practical advice
    2010/05/06 02:37:50 PM
    All spheres of government and civil society have to co-operate and prioritise rendering the services
    provided for in the Children’s Act. A Practical Approach to the Children’s Act covers every aspect of
    the law governed by the Children’s Act, ensuring that all factors are taken into account when making
    assessments and formulating advice.

    • parental responsibilities and rights
    • children’s courts
    a complete, user-friendly guide that will assist you with the practical implementation of the Act.
    Readers will benefit greatly from the clear suggestions and instructions in the publication, as well as the notes indicating the appropriate regulations and forms at each section.

    A Practical Approach to the Children’s Act
    ISBN: 9780409032819

    To order call 0860 765 432

    Publisher:
    LexisNexis, PO Box 792, Durban, 4000
    0860 765 432
    www.lexisnexis.co.za
  23. Happy Dad
    2010/05/06 01:02:40 PM
    @Velo:
    You have been misinformed. The law is active but not everybody has been trained on it.
    I live in johannesburg and have approached family court and my matter is almost resolved using the new law as the basis for all arguments.
    You just need to speak to the right people.
    This law has saved me so much money and has helped me to force my ex to see that we need to be mature for the sake of our daughter.We are now on speaking terms instead of screaming terms.
    I strongly recommend that all fathers that are having their rights violated approach the family court.
  24. Velo
    2010/05/05 02:59:06 PM
    It would seem that YOU magazine has mislead the public as I have contacted the Department of Justice and was advised otherwise. I even have a voice recording that parents will still need to apply to High Court for Acess.
  25. What to do?
    2010/05/05 01:10:19 PM
    I have a disabled child, and the father wanted the child aborted from the outset. He is a special child who needs a lot of financial support, love and care and the father pays a few hundred rand per month, and the child has to fit into his schedules all the time. Everyone always says fathers are hard done by, yes the fathers who did and do help and support, and truly love their children is one thing and they should be given equal rights and contact, but then you get the other side of the coin. And now he wants my child to live with him yet he cannot even afford his treatments or make the time for them? What is the family law on disabled children? HE has money for legal fees, but not the special needs of the child? Surely one should wake up and understand that the child needs this money, not the lawyers.
  26. Lesley Corrie
    2010/05/04 08:22:50 PM
    A Practical Approach to the Children's Act is available at LexisNexis
  27. Gareth
    2010/05/03 08:29:17 PM
    I am struggling to save my daughter from the life she is living right now.She is four turning five in November this year. Is there anything i can do to get custody of my daughter, when i can see that things are not going well for her being in the moms custody. I see the problems with her grade RR reports at school and in the way she socialises with other children around her, she is scared of everything and on the nights that she is with us she wakes up screaming cause they tought her that there is a boogieman....sorry but this to me is not right especially a four year old. There are too many things to mention...but would like some advice of what to do to improve her young life before its too late. I dont have enough money to fight a long legal battle but she does deserve a safer environment where she can learn to grow her self-esteem here by her dad !

    Kind regards
    gareth
  28. PREMY
    2010/05/03 04:06:50 PM
    PLEASE ADVICE WHEN DOES THIS NEW LAW COME INTO EFFECT.
  29. Hester Bosman-Sadie
    2010/05/03 08:59:31 AM
    ernoswanepoel@gmail.com
    Advocate and Legal Researcher for book on the Children's Act.
  30. Marie
    2010/04/30 05:13:44 PM
    Where can I find a website with the ammended childrens act, or a laymans translation ?
  31. Henning Oosthuizen
    2010/04/28 01:18:11 PM
    I would like to get a copy of the book" a Practical Approach to the child act". I live in Richards Bay and have asked at the local book store, but they can not help. Please advice me on where to get a copy of the book. I was divorced on 27 March 2009 and stil to this day is met with great difficulty. I need to build a proper relationship with my child. Please help?

    Thank you and best regards

    Henning Oosthuizen
  32. Sari
    2010/04/23 07:28:21 PM
    where can i find a website with the ammended childrens act, or a laymans translation ????
  33. Haley Jacobs
    2010/04/21 10:03:52 PM
    It was awesome to read this article as my husband and I are struggling for almost a year to get more access to his kids. The mom can't come to terms with the fact that he didn'e marry her and is using the kids as pawns. He has paid for everything for the kids while they were together and after that but she wanted the cash and decided to take him to maintenance court. Because of her greed she has now come up with less but has applied for an increase. She only thinks about herself . We have 2 cases of neglect against her but sadly social service did not deal with the case appropriately and found all her ctions reasonable which was unacceptable in other social workers eyes. We have a date at the children's court next week and hopefully something will come from that. We fear that something will happen to them. They need some stability in their lives as that has all been taken away from them
  34. Elize Nolte Lourens
    2010/04/21 08:56:42 PM
    My dogter is ses en n half jaar terug getroud,maar het toe reeds n dogterjie van 7j in die huwelik geneem, en die man het ook n buite egtelike seuntjie van toe 3j oud.....Daar was altyd konflik in die verhouding.n man wat baie arrogant,bombasties en net aan homself dink, onregverdigheid tussen die kinders,beide ouers wat baie goed is vir hul eie kinders....materialisties kort hul niks.....maar as daar struwelinge ontstaan,dan word mekaar se kinders teen mekaar afgespeel ( soos genoem (Klankbord) in Huisgenoot van 15 April) ....my kleindogter nou byna 14 en sy seuntjie 9.....dit vir haar so ondraaglik geword dat sy haar ma gese het sy gaan en kan nie meer daar bly nie,want sy se haar skoolwerk en dies meer lei daaronder...sy het toe n aand hier kom bly,haar ma is n baie goeie ma.....maar toe die kind aandring dat sy nie meer daar gaan bly nie,en dat sy geen ander uitweg sien nie....het haar ma haar gese....sy moet haar nie dreig om nie daar te wil bly nie...want sy net 13+ ....en ook genoem dat sy dan nie n Christen is nie as sy nie die man nog n kans gee nie, dit is en was verpletterde woorde vir my...wat weet dat die n baie liefde volle kind is,en haar Here ken net soos haar ma....haar ma het haar selfde middag na n sielkundige gevat,wat my gerus gestel het, sielkundige het voorgestel dat kleindogter die naweek terug gaan en kyk of (stiefpa noem hom Oom )dan nou so kwansuis verander het!!!, indien nie...dan moet kleindogter weet dat dit dan nie sal werk tussen hulle nie.....Ek wil graag weet wat is die kind se regte ASB!!! indien sy verdere probleme ondervind!!!
  35. Evelyn
    2010/04/21 12:56:39 PM
    My ex and I seperated almost two years ago now. The reason I asked him to leave - was because he didnt have time for me and our children!!! He has had the kids for a very long one night, all of this time. I am the main breadwinner for our daughters and they are my everything. I recall that for the most of last yr, I was crying and begging and pleaing with him (and his mom) to share custody of the children with me. Ie. have the girls over weekends, his annual leave, long weekends, etc. But I couldnt get though to them. I gave up and now, more than ever are my children and I happy. With the new law in effect, I would like to see what tricks he will try. He'd say: "I have to ask my mum if they can come over." And that is just the limit!!! I say the child act should protect the children yes, but do I subject my children to telling them what daddy says everytime he cant have them over???
  36. Lulu
    2010/04/21 11:25:33 AM
    I'm in two minds about this new law. My daughter is now 2 years old and I have had to fight with my ex continuously over maintenance, it is only now that I threatened to go to a lawyer that he is making the effort to pay. He pays a decent amount which helps but what about the rest. The agreement was that it would be equal but it doesn't work like that. He gets to see his daughter every second Saturday and has access to her Monday to Thursday and is welcome to come and visit her at my home. He never makes the effort to come in the week but he says that he misses her so much. I don't disagree with father having equal rights but then they should share the financial side of things too. Unfortunetly children cost money to raise whether we like it or not, and as times are getting harder and things more expensive it is not easy for a single mother to do everthing on her own. I have no objection to my ex wanting to be a part of his daughters life and wanting to be with her. I'm just saying that fair is fair and that mothers and fathers should work together on all of this. Its not fair when fathers want all their rights but don't want all the responsibility !!!! Not all fathers are deadbeat as not all woman are manipulative !!! I JUST SAY FAIR IS FAIR !!!!
  37. Jenny
    2010/04/21 08:39:10 AM
    I agreed with Frieda - well said...
  38. Cliff
    2010/04/20 07:53:42 PM
    I am the father of the most beautiful 11month old girl. I am allowed to see her for half a day a week when it pleases my ex fiancees mom which has such a tight grip on her, my ex herself has started to tell me she hates me and rejects all forms of communication. Yet i have paid for every single expense even tried to rent a place with her. With her mother stealing money and food from our already tight budget I could not afford to do that anymore. Now that we dont stay together i dont even see my ex... I get to drive her to the work i arranged for her, on the day i can see my child(if she is working that day.) Otherwise nothing. This law would give me a chance to have a say in my childs life, as i would want to give her more opportunities than what my ex(with only st8 because her parents refused to pay schoolfees) had. And for the brainwashing, that can only be stopped when a certain person ceases to exist. Heres a smile from an very unhappy father.
  39. In doubt but About Time
    2010/04/19 09:50:33 AM
    Hi Pete Nicholls UK

    It is easier said than done.
    It is a democratic and constitutional right for a father to have equal access to his children. No parent brought children into this world to spend weekends with his children only.
    Mother of children think that it is there right to have the children majority of the time, when to allow access to the father's because they carried the baby for nine months and have a special bond with that child and the father does not have the same bond.
    To wait for the courts and child advocate to do there investigation and to make a decision takes a very long time, during that time, the father has to abide to what is dictated by the spouse and her attorney, in most cases the children are brainwashed of negative things about the father

    If the father forces his equal time and access, it creates a large amount of animosity between both parents, which could carry over to the children as one parents has hidden agendas.
    I had to force my equal access, prove to psychologist and child advocate that my children adapted and enjoy equal physical access with both parents and that it is for the best interests of the children.
  40. Happy Farther
    2010/04/18 06:03:01 PM
    D L Wilson sounds like Lawyer that has been through a bad break-up and hates farthers.
  41. Pete Nicholls UK
    2010/04/18 02:00:39 PM
    Firstky, well done SA government for bringing in this much needed legislation, we are desperately fighting for something similar over here. As for the parents that are critical I have this challange for you; if this legislation does not meet your need for financial support enforcement why do you wish it to be abolished which is the essence of what I'm reading? In other words, as the law doesn't stop 'group A' being beaten up, then laws to stop 'group b' should be ceased. The two issues are both serious, both need resolving but, despite being related, are not the same. This is about what the ids need - they primarily need both parents and following closely they need adequate both aprents to financially support. This new legislation is a brave and common sense approach, witholding a child from the other parent is abuse of the child - you may not like to think it as it makes you uncomfortable but thats the fact. If you do it and get jail time perhaps you'll have some time to reflect on your reasons and educate yourself on what's in the best interest of the child, not you. Of course, the assumption is that if a parent (mostly father) is errant, doesn't bother turning up etc... then he'll lose that right. For those good fathers however that cannot see their children despite being good loving decent fathers, why should thos echildren too lose out on a father, Get real guys and stop the whining and think about your real motives - it should be all about the children, nothing else.
  42. Abused Father
    2010/04/17 06:32:06 PM
    Its nothing short of a miracle that this law is now being passed. I was denied my father till I was 13. He turned out to be nothing near to what he was portrayed as for all those years. Now I have had the same thing done to me by what I prefer to refer to as 'females' as there are genuine good women in this world.
  43. Maarten
    2010/04/17 04:11:20 PM
    Hi there. I am an unmarried father in the throes of high court action over care and contact. I fulfill ALL of the criteria as laid out in sect 21. After a failed mediation with the Family Advocate I was forced to go the High Court route. My daughters mother summarily suspended my contact with my daughter after a disagreement last July which turned frankly’Trailer Park’ and resulted in her friend, a woman’ punching me in the face in the presence of my daughter. My very soft application was met with a 60 page responding document which included allegations of drug abuse, child porn among others. The FA has been dragging its feet and frustrating the HELL outta me! They were ordered to investigate and have a report ready by the 20th of Jan. Its now almost 3 months overdue and the only people gaining any benefit are our legal teams! Can anyone please give me a reference to the Govt Gazette or tell me where I can find the relevant info PLEASE? My beautiful daughter is being damaged by this ongoing conflict which her mother seems intent on exposing her to. How has this new legislation changed anything? Can I enforce any contact without an order? I miss my daughter terribly as does she miss me. I did have unsupervised contact every Sat and Wed over the holiday period, but now that the order has effectively ‘expired’ she is refusing me contact again.HELP!!!! Feel free to contact me on my cell at 0827124442 Thanx for a great resource.
  44. AYP
    2010/04/17 11:08:30 AM
    after my divorce i was denied access to my angels(2) for 5years,then she decided she was broke,allowed me access just to gain money.now that i am unemployed,she has stopped me from seeing or phoning them.the law was always on her side allowing her to enforce and enact her grudge.maybe this new law will help fathers like myself.
  45. very concerned parent
    2010/04/16 04:27:32 PM
    @Grant Stapleton i agree total with you, my baby girls father is a drug addict has never paid maintenance and when we do visitation he does not arrive because he does not like the destination.. its not about him its about the child.


    can someone at the you please answer our questions!!!!!!
  46. concerned parent
    2010/04/16 04:05:28 PM
    please advise with this question i also want to know:


    Pse advise - what happens if the mother re-locates to another country with the child - does the unmarried father have any rights then ? Can the mother leave without the fathers permission ?
  47. Grant Stapleton
    2010/04/16 12:56:15 PM
    I am a grandfather of two little grand kids, all i can say is shame on the South African law for passing the new childrens act with out taking the childrens side.
    The Fathers that have no custody rights and deserve to have, i also feel sorry for, but this act
    Does not protect the mother that does not get paid her maintance for his children.
    Does not protect the mother that the father misses visitation times and will only see the children when he makes the time.
    Does not protect the mother from abuse of the man in front of his children.
    Does not protect the mother from protecting her children from an abusive father.
    Does not protect the mother from
    Does not protect the mother, at all ,who after all is protecting her children.
    This is written for all the mothers whose voices are not heard that have tried to protect there children from little men that only want the name of Daddy and there ego has been hurt. These men are experts at playing the court with cases being continually postponed due to the father not handing in correct documents etc. and in the mean time the children are suffering.


  48. In doubt but About Time
    2010/04/16 11:40:04 AM
    Since February 2008 it has cos me over R200 00 rands in attorney fees to fight for equal physical access to my children and my wife lives a few minutes walk from me.
    My wife has had a number of illicit affairs and doing it in front of my children.
    I have been falsely accused of many things and my children used as tools for self gain.
    If the YOU editor is willing to hear my story please inform me.
    I have been informed that the court are not interested at all about morels and Christian values as long as a parent provides food, clothes and a roof over the children. then they are regarded as good parents. It is a known fact, it is not very easy for the father to become the primary caregiver as the courts, child advocate's office still regard that the mother as the better parent. The father still has to prove to all of his love and dedication towards for his children and the mother does not need to.

    It is a fathers right to have equal access to his children regardless in what the mother has to say and it must be enforced as a default in the children act. At the moment the father is regarded as every second weekend. It has been proven the outcome of children spending equal time with each parent grow up with less problems and that the fathers do not loose the true bond with his children.
  49. Conserned Mom
    2010/04/16 11:24:38 AM
    I have 3 children from 3 different fathers im going through my second divorce now. I get NO money from the fathers and they are ducking and diving not wanting to pay maintenance. The father of my last child wanted nothing to do with him and he is now already 15mths old and the father has NEVER seen him he has even been in town 2 blocks away a few times, now he wants to take my baby away from me, just to spite me. How do i go about keeping my child??? How can he have any right to take my baby away from me!!!!
  50. Struggling Single Mother
    2010/04/16 11:18:46 AM
    I agree with the New Act as it takes in to account the childs needs. I would however make provision for the child to have more say in the matter. I would also included that a registered child phsycologist should always be consulted and that there opion should have some weight as the family advorcates office is under too much pressure and they get the important information wrong. If lawyers were not so expensive more people would get better advice and the children needs would be seen to from the start.
    Now for the Maintenance laws to get up to speed so that the fathers that want to duck and dive and use all means to not pay is showing how irresponsible and spiteful they really are and that needs to be taken into account.
  51. CA
    2010/04/16 10:06:20 AM
    Financial issues also need to be enforced, non-custodial parents should also be forced to contribute to the child's support. Many parents plead unemployment when it comes to financial support. This act is incomplete if it does not include financial support of the child. Aslo where parent/parents have been abusive to each other during the marriage, counselling should be advised for that parent. From my experience an abusive parent does not stop being verbally, physically or emotional abusive just because they are divorce. Courts should enforce that the abusive parent get professional help as this is detrimental to the child's relationship with the parent. My x is always bringing me down when the kids are with him.. They come home after the weekend frustrated at the things that they father said about their mother. Who do we turn to? This act is incomplete if it does not take into account issues like these!
  52. Vanessa
    2010/04/15 03:00:49 PM
    Refer to YOU dated 15/04/2010. My rights were taken away and the law are not interested in the child's needs. Although the magistrate found it fit to supply me with a form4 where the child has been placed in safe custody. The court day the child was devistated she was screaming not to take her back to the father's house still they didn't see it fit to help her. If you can be so kind to give me contact details of Erno Swanepoel,phone number or email,will be much appreciated. It is exactly 3 years since we last saw the child. Please advise if there is anything else we can do.
  53. Concerned
    2010/04/15 11:45:46 AM
    Pse advise - what happens if the mother re-locates to another country with the child - does the unmarried father have any rights then ? Can the mother leave without the fathers permission ?
  54. Fathers for Justice
    2010/04/15 11:32:38 AM
    It is a long, long time overdue. There is not much you can do about dead beat parents that abandons their children. Sad as it is why would you want to expose your child to a dead beat parent? If the parent do wish to have contact then it should be so, the laws where written to protect the children and their rights not for spiteful and malicious parents that serves their own interest. Laws for claiming maintenance been there for quite a while and all it takes is a visit to the maintenance officer at your local court. It is ignorance that is the problem there unlike the thousands of defenceless children there is because these laws lacked. The world is not fair but hopefully these laws is a step in the right direction
  55. edna jacobs
    2010/04/14 07:43:27 PM
    Thank God for this new childrens act but can anyone please refer us where to start procedures as my son is in a similiar sitiuation whereby he he does not have regular acess to his kids.He contacted the Mitchells Plain Magistrates courts and were told that they are not handling these cases yet as they have not yet been trained to deal with such cases.Hallo....how can a new law come in to effect and people get turned down?is this just another way where the courts are protecting these selfish women who are using their kids as pawns to get what they want and cannot move on with their lives??????
  56. JD
    2010/04/14 02:35:05 PM
    I dated my child's father for two years when i fell pregnant. He forced me to go for an abortion and i refused. Now my daughter is 2 years old, he is not a part of her life at all and he chose not to ever have anything to do with her. He lives with his parents and sister, but he only informed the sister of my pregnancy whereafter she phoned me when i was 7 months pregnant and threatened me that if i ever had to bring the child to their doorstep she would have me "dealt" with. I had to fight 6 court battles and pay alot of money to my lawyer to get him to pay child support. He literally plagued me to allow him to sign off his rights so he can "go on with his life." He nows pays maintenance for the past 5 months (regularly), but i haven't heard from him in almost a year. His parents still don't know about the child's existence, because according to him "it will kill them." I have a new love in my love now, but since fathers have the same rights now, does this mean that my deadbeat ex can just wake up one morning, feel like tormenting me a bit and all of a sudden claim visiting rights? By the way, the only reason why he pays maintenance now is because i had threatened to reveal my daughter's existence to his parents if he failed to do so. Another reason that made him cough up is when his lawyer explained to him that he could lose his assets to cover the maintenance and that he might even risk a bad credit record. So don't think he is paying because he has feels like taking responsibility. If he was ever going to spite or hurt me, then it would be if he all of a sudden wants rights and try to F* up the live i had built for my daughter with her new daddy. I think he should be jailed for not having the balls to admit to his friends and family that he had father a child two years ago and thet she lives 12 minutes drive away.
  57. frieda
    2010/04/14 01:44:05 PM
    as grandparents we agree , children has the right to proper parental care ...
    ...it is about time
    now their best interests come first.
    so all you woman using children as pawns to get what you want ,, the game is over

    well done!!!!!!


  58. ZITA
    2010/04/14 11:33:49 AM
    I AGREE WITH DL WILSON
  59. Helen Colam
    2010/04/14 11:02:40 AM
    All i can say is it is about time that fathers had the same rights as mothers.
    I am sick and tired of mothers thinking that because they carried the child for 9 months this gives them more rights to their children. I am also sick and tired of woman falling pregnant on purpose to trap men into marraige and then wondering why their husbands cheat on them after marraige.
    I'm sick and tired of woman using their children as pawns to get what they want in life.
    As far as i am concerned this is more despicable than anything. Any woman who does this to a man deserves all the misery she can get.
  60. Jan Kotze
    2010/04/14 10:57:01 AM
    Your article in YOU magazine 15 April 2010 regarding the new children's act
    I need the best possible advice I can get.
    Is it possible to help me contact ERNO SWANEPOEL who was involved
    with the Book "Practical Approach to the children's act.
    I want to make a appointment to consult with him urgently
  61. conserned
    2010/04/14 10:50:33 AM
    What about fathers that abused the mother in front of the child, and had affairs with other woman while married and told these woman that he is devorced, where in fact he is still married, when he gets visitation say for instance 30 min, he stays for 15min and leaves in a hurry to see his floozy, instead of spending that time with his daughter???? I dont think this is fair, if the mother takes care of the child and supports the child and the father was never interested in the first place why should he get rights now all of a sudden now that the law has changed, he is just gonna be spitefull isnt he???
  62. T
    2010/04/14 08:37:55 AM
    when is this law in-effect?????
    I am in a situation where with the law I know the father has to apply for his rights as he did not compile with the rules, he would only have rights if he compiled with at least 3 of these rules and they were:
    1. if we were married
    2. if we lived together
    3. he has contributed towards the upbringing of the child.

    now he has not complied with any of these, so why should he get automatic rights? I was the only parent contributing to the upbringing of the child.
  63. R
    2010/04/13 10:46:57 PM
    Can YOU please confirm if a Parental Plan is indeed now compulsery. I am going through a divorce where my ex is using the child as a cash cow, and simply refused to even consider the Parental Plan I suggested for discussion. Her lawyer just says they don't agree with some of the content, and therefore they won't consider the entire Plan. If it is compulsery then at least she has to consider my Plan and we can negotiate a Plan that is suitable for both.
  64. Proud Mom with no issues
    2010/04/13 05:00:38 PM
    This law is long overdue! It will begin to restore the moral fibre of our society because every child will have access to both parents regardless of the issues between mom and dad. I applaude our legislators for this law it is beyond progressive. Women must learn to deal with issues separately maintanance does not equal an entrance/access fee. Issues of maintanance must be dealt with separately from issues of access. I agree that parents who then reglect to use their rights must be jailed especially if they are grated full access to the child. Let us begin to talk openly about how we raise our kids because its a joint effort that does not only affect our well being but that of our children. Amandla!
  65. Velo
    2010/04/13 04:01:45 PM
    From the email that are coming throigh I think Maintence and Acess are dealt different as if the mother require Maintence, she will go to her nerarest court and get the order, if the father require acess he must first go the Family Advocate Office and request to meet with the mother and grant the rights, if the mother doesnt want to come it is fine, then the father needs to hire a lawyer to make an appeal to the High Court, which the father must fit the bill for. Now is that fare? As we all know all our cases are different from each, but is it fair to generalise and say that the father are alway at fault. Even though this act has been passed I was just told by the Department of Justice(Durban Office) that i might stillneed to make an application to the High Court.
    Can someone from the YOU magazine please confirm this line that was noted in the article."This has now changed. Previously they’d have to approach the high court on issues of custody and access to a child. Now they can appeal to an officer of the children’s court at their local magistrate’s court and it won’t cost them a cent."
  66. Alida May
    2010/04/13 01:25:14 PM
    What about the parent with parental rights that simple choice not to see the child. Should this parent not be jailed???????
  67. Velo
    2010/04/13 11:06:16 AM
    I agree wuth this law as I was at a disadvantage as my previous partner refused acess so I refused to pay maintenance but now I am pay the maintenance.
    This is the only way that parent get acess to to their children. Our goverment has made a good descion.
    Another comment I would like to say is that maintenance has got nothing to do with acess, I dont see why he or she should not be allowed to have acess when paying for maintenance , obviously the spouse would say that he or she was abusive, this is just done to spite one other,
    But also in all fainess there are certain case that are valid and were proven the the father ot mother is abusive that parent needs to only have supervised acess,

    Thank you to our goverment in getting this right.

    On my was to our local magistrate’s court :-)
  68. Souxie
    2010/04/13 10:02:50 AM
    I disagree with this law... What happens if the father refuses to pay maintenance or if he denies the paternity of his child and it's proved that he is the father?
  69. D L Wilson
    2010/04/12 07:39:17 PM
    If withholding visitation is for selfsish reasons i agree-bitterness etc... but if the "Father" is irresponsible/relocates and has "drunken outbursts" why should the "CHILDREN (PROTECTED) be subjected to that behaviour??? ALSO WHERE IS THE MAINTENANCE ACT THAT SAYS - THEY MUST PAY REGARDLESS OF "THEIR" FINANCIAL STRUGGLES - How is that a 'FATHER"... who DUCKS MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS???
Your name: Your email address:

Copyright © 2010 Media24. All rights reserved. Built by Blueworld Communities